Unstable has always been a bit confusing (at least for me) because we
had "stable" packages in a unstable repo. Maybe you could do a
Stable/Testing or Stable/Unstable. We've only ever had one relevant ppa
and that has been unstable.
/"Install your software from the unstable ppa"//
//"I don't want unstable software"
"That's not what it means"
/Randy/
/
On 04/25/2016 01:15 PM, Martin Landa wrote:
Hi,
2016-04-24 22:02 GMT+02:00 Angelos Tzotsos <gcpp.kal...@gmail.com
<mailto:gcpp.kal...@gmail.com>>:
For the Testing and Unstable repositories, all Ubuntu EOL releases
were also removed from the archives to save space.
I wonder if we really need three repos. Probably two repos - stable
and testing/unstable would be enough. Martin
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
_______________________________________________
UbuntuGIS mailing list
Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki
--
-----------------
Randal Hale
North River Geographic Systems, Inc
http://www.northrivergeographic.com
423.653.3611 rjh...@northrivergeographic.com
twitter:rjhale http://about.me/rjhale
http://www.northrivergeographic.com/introduction-to-quantum-gis
https://www.facebook.com/NRGSInc
_______________________________________________
UbuntuGIS mailing list
Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki
