Hi, 2016-04-25 19:26 GMT+02:00 Randal Hale <rjh...@northrivergeographic.com>: > Unstable has always been a bit confusing (at least for me) because we had > "stable" packages in a unstable repo. Maybe you could do a Stable/Testing or > Stable/Unstable. We've only ever had one relevant ppa and that has been > unstable.
as GRASS packager I would use stable repo for stable releases and testing/unstable for RCs. Moreover it's easier to maintain two repos rather then two. Bearing in mind man power which UbuntuGIS project has. Martin -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa _______________________________________________ UbuntuGIS mailing list Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki