On Sunday 26 October 2008 01:49:53 Carmelo Amoroso wrote: > Rob Landley wrote: > > On Wednesday 17 September 2008 06:29:34 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > >> Search in the list for similar issues. I sugegsted a work-around in the > >> past. I've got also a complete fix for uclibc, but up to now, never > >> committed. > >> > >> Carmelo > >> > >> P.S. > >> Please send emails in text/plain, not html > > > > You say this while top-posting. :) > > > > Is your fix for uClibc, or uClibc++? This appears to be a uClibc++ > > issue, how do you fix it in uClibc? > > Hi Rob, > the fix is in uClibc, it consists of moving the implementation from ld.so > and libdl.a to libc.so/libc.a.
Could you give me a little more detail about exactly what the issue is? (Ok, I read the patch, but "it breaks" and "this fixes it" doesn't really help me form a good mental model of what's going on here...) The error message Flemming reported was trying to access a tls symbol, which uClibc still doesn't support...? (Or is this a patch to the nptl branch?) Rob _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
