On Thursday 25 December 2008 18:58, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > "New" regex results > > testregex: > TEST testregex basic, 533 tests, 6 errors > TEST testregex categorize, 21 tests, 0 errors > TEST testregex forcedassoc, 47 tests, 9 errors > TEST testregex interpretation, 148 tests, 6 signals, 36 errors > TEST testregex leftassoc, 16 tests, 8 errors > TEST testregex nullsubexpr, 112 tests, 2 signals, 3 errors > TEST testregex repetition, 81 tests, 5 errors > TEST testregex rightassoc, 20 tests, 4 errors
I fixed the bug (which wasn't in regex, rather in my memset (embarrasing, yeah)), and now it looks like: TEST testregex basic, 538 tests, 1 error TEST testregex categorize, 19 tests, 0 errors TEST testregex forcedassoc, 47 tests, 9 errors TEST testregex interpretation, 166 tests, 6 signals, 18 errors TEST testregex leftassoc, 16 tests, 8 errors TEST testregex nullsubexpr, 112 tests, 2 signals, 3 errors TEST testregex repetition, 81 tests, 5 errors TEST testregex rightassoc, 20 tests, 4 errors Again, old regex results: > testregex: > TEST testregex basic, 538 tests, 1 error > TEST testregex categorize, 21 tests, 0 errors > TEST testregex forcedassoc, 47 tests, 9 errors > TEST testregex interpretation, 167 tests, 6 signals, 17 errors > TEST testregex leftassoc, 16 tests, 8 errors > TEST testregex nullsubexpr, 83 tests, 32 errors > TEST testregex repetition, 79 tests, 8 errors > TEST testregex rightassoc, 20 tests, 4 errors so new regex is a bit more correct here.... In tst-regex2, it works 100% correctly now, and is much faster than old one. tst-regexloc still fails. -- vda _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
