On 05/07/2013 10:02 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > On May 6, 2013, at 9:10 PM, Vineet Gupta <vineet.gup...@synopsys.com> wrote: > >>> This attribute_hidden should not be resurrected. >> Is this because uClibc convention is to specify this only with prototypes >> which is >> already being done. > is it possible to rename the conflicting functions in busy box?
I suppose we could - but the hidden proto for these still has value in that PLT can be avoided for calls within uClibc. -Vineet _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
