On May 8, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Rich Felker <dal...@aerifal.cx> wrote: > On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 09:32:57PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> On May 6, 2013, at 9:10 PM, Vineet Gupta <vineet.gup...@synopsys.com> wrote: >> >>>> This attribute_hidden should not be resurrected. >>> >>> Is this because uClibc convention is to specify this only with >>> prototypes which is already being done. >> >> is it possible to rename the conflicting functions in busy box? > > This is definitely the wrong solution. If uClibc is clashing with the > namespace reserved for the application, the symbol name in uClibc > needs to be fixed not to clash (i.e. appropriately prefixed with > underscores).
Yes thats better _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
