On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 09:32:57PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On May 6, 2013, at 9:10 PM, Vineet Gupta <vineet.gup...@synopsys.com> wrote: > > >> This attribute_hidden should not be resurrected. > > > > Is this because uClibc convention is to specify this only with > > prototypes which is already being done. > > is it possible to rename the conflicting functions in busy box?
This is definitely the wrong solution. If uClibc is clashing with the namespace reserved for the application, the symbol name in uClibc needs to be fixed not to clash (i.e. appropriately prefixed with underscores). Rich _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
