Michael Schnell wrote: > >The header problem is known to LGPL authors, so section 6a says also: > > > > (It is understood > > that the user who changes the contents of definitions files in the > > Library will not necessarily be able to recompile the application > > to use the modified definitions.) > > > >But if the headers introduce incompatibilities, the new library can't > >be used in place of the previous one, so there is no real problem. > > This does not seem to prevent the restriction on using the header files > (If they are not defined explicitly as non-LGPL).
No, but LGPL 2.1 section 5 does, for a subset of the things which can appear in header files, as quoted in my earlier mail today. -- Jamie _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
