Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:11:27PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: > >> Have I missed the right repo, or isn't there one? > > > > That kernel is really just a compilation of lots of other trees > > (mostly vendors trees), almost none of which are git trees. > > Much of the change in there is probably not mainline ready in > > any shape or form. > > > > In terms of m68knommu support it generally tracks behind my > > git kernel.org git tree. > > Seems to me m68knommu in current Linus releases of 2.6 is actually > quite good. Certainly works for me on mcf527[01].
Thanks everyone. These answers are really helpful, because it's not always easy to see if a large set of changes are critical ones that are slow to be mainlined, or vendor branches that don't matter except for those vendors. I'm still recovering from the 2.4.x era, where -ucN patches were needed to get anything useful done, and not mainlined. I fetched the m68knommu git and compared it with mainline, and all the architecture changes are mainlined already. Glad to see that, and it's not surprising it works well. :-) I've found a few minor buglets in the latest uClinux-dist kernel, and patch the simple ones as I go. I use git myself to keep track of local patches to the distributed trees. What's the best way to feed back those patches into uClinux-dist? Thanks a lot, -- Jamie _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
