On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:43, Greg Ungerer <g...@snapgear.com> wrote:
> On 27/04/12 09:08, Luis Alves wrote:
>> This is the first of a pack of patches to support the original 68000 cpu.
>> This adds:
>> -MC68000 cpu as a choice in the config menu.
>> -Alcetronics M68K board (uses this cpu).
>
> Nice!
But the actual arch/m68k/platform/68000/ part is missing?
>> -Modified CONFIG_MCPU32 to select CONFIG_M68XXX.
>> -Modified CONFIG_M68360 to select CONFIG_M68XXX (I think it was missing
>> some settings).
>> -Modified some files to use CONFIG_M68XXX instead of
>> CONFIG_M68000/CONFIG_MCPU32
>
> Although there was no true 68000 part supported before the intention
> of the CONFIG_M68000 define was for that CPU - or any SoC type part that
> contained a true 68000 CPU core. And it would be good to keep that
Indeed.
> naming so it is consistent with the other 680x0 cores.
Indeed, ...
>> -#if defined(CONFIG_M68000) || defined(CONFIG_COLDFIRE)
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_M68XXX) || defined(CONFIG_COLDFIRE)
"CONFIG_M68XXX || CONFIG_COLDFIRE" makes me think "Isn't this always
true?"...
>> /*
>> * The simpler m68k and ColdFire processors do not have a 32*32->64
>> * multiply instruction. So we need to handle them a little differently.
>> diff --git a/arch/m68k/lib/memcpy.c b/arch/m68k/lib/memcpy.c
>> index 10ca051..c0a1ae8 100644
>> --- a/arch/m68k/lib/memcpy.c
>> +++ b/arch/m68k/lib/memcpy.c
>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ void *memcpy(void *to, const void *from, size_t n)
>> from = cfrom;
>> n--;
>> }
>> -#if defined(CONFIG_M68000)
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_M68XXX)
... and CONFIG_M68XXX sounds like it's set for e.g. '020 too.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
