Hi, Some time ago I was able to build my own non-working gcc toolchain for the 68000 but in the end, after exchanging some mails I've found out that support for the 68000 core was 'removed' since gcc >= 4.3 (I think Greg might remember this discussion)
I've filled up a bug report (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53386) I Don't know if the same was done for the CPU32 core but you better find out before waiting time like I did. At the moment I'm still using gcc 4.2.x Regards, Luis On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Greg Ungerer <g...@snapgear.com> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > On 02/08/12 17:33, Michael Schnell wrote: >> >> This is rather off-topic, but I don't know where else I might find >> experts on this. >> >> I do development for the Innovasic FIDO processor, which is an 68 K >> "CPU32" architecture, in fact a kind of upgrade tho the ubiquitously >> used 68332 chip. >> >> The Eclipse based IDE called "Sourcery" comes with a GNU compiler that >> is built to work in FIDO-mode by default, but it also can be set to >> compile for other chips (e.g. 68332, here it does not support the two >> assembler instructions that are new with FIDO (e.g. "sleep"). > > > Do you know what version of gcc it uses? > > > >> Now I found that the code Generator seems to be rather bad. It generates >> rather nasty code using a much higher count of instructions than >> necessary, avoiding the more "CISK-specific" instruction in the CPU32 >> instruction set (such as moving a value from memory to memory, setting a >> bit in a memory-cell, ...) >> >> My very old MRI compiler for the 332 is a lot better on that behalf. >> >> Is there any chance to find a more decent 68 K GNU C compiler ? > > > Have you considered compiling your own? > > Regards > Greg > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: g...@snapgear.com > SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888 > 8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323 > Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com > > _______________________________________________ > uClinux-dev mailing list > uClinux-dev@uclinux.org > http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev > This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org > To unsubscribe see: > http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
