On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Michael Schnell <mschn...@lumino.de> wrote: > On 08/03/2012 03:34 PM, Luis Alves wrote: >> >> Since the volatile tells exactly that you want to use registers during >> the manipulation of those variables, so I'm not surprised that it >> doesn't change memory contents directly. > > > Sorry for being vague and providing invalid code for the example. > > I did not intend to define the volatile variables within the function (thus > on the stack) but outside (as global memory based variables). >
In my test code, I've defined them as global variables. Regards > > -Michael > _______________________________________________ > uClinux-dev mailing list > uClinux-dev@uclinux.org > http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev > This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org > To unsubscribe see: > http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
