Hi Andrea, That [1] would work for me - thanks. Hopefully Jody can join us as well as anyone else - the more the merrier.
1 - http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=uDIG+IRC&iso=20110630T16&ah=1 Cheers Mifan On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:13 PM, andrea antonello < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mifan, > > > Sorry - I'll be out at the newer time you have suggested. Would some > other > > time work for you? Maybe later than the previous suggested time? Let me > > know. > > ok, let me try later. Would this work? > > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=uDIG+IRC&iso=20110630T16&ah=1 > > The only thing I am afraid of, is that we will loose Jody's support, > which is always very valuable. > > I think an IRC now would be very important, so I would do it anyways > (Jody please don't be offended :)). > > Andrea > > > > Thanks > > Mifan > > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:40 PM, andrea antonello > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Mifan, > >> thanks for all the updates. > >> > >> I have a problem with the IRC time, since I already have a bussiness > >> meeting in your proposed timeframe. Would it be possible to anticipate > >> by 3 hours? > >> > >> That would be: > >> > >> > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=uDIG+IRC&iso=20110630T09&ah=1 > >> > >> Andrea > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Mifan Careem <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I have come up with a revised version of the catalog browse view > concept > >> > C > >> > here [1]. This is based on the shortcomings of the previous concept B > >> > here > >> > [2]. Please take a look at the suggestions. Hopefully this would solve > >> > most > >> > of the scenarios, if not all. > >> > I can explain this in detail in the IRC chat we plan to have on > Thursday > >> > [3] > >> > to see whether this fits the bill. > >> > 1 > >> > > >> > - > http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/UDIG/GSoC+2011+-+Catalog+View+Reports#GSoC2011-CatalogViewReports-conceptc > >> > 2 > >> > > >> > - > http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/UDIG/GSoC+2011+-+Catalog+View+Reports#GSoC2011-CatalogViewReports-conceptb > >> > 3 > >> > > >> > - > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=uDIG+IRC&iso=20110630T12&ah=1 > >> > Cheers > >> > Mifan > >> > > >> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jody Garnett < > [email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> The feature type is often the name of the file; and consists of the > >> >> attribute columns defined for that shapefile. > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Jody Garnett > >> >> > >> >> On Wednesday, 22 June 2011 at 9:17 PM, Mifan Careem wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hi All, > >> >> I'm working on some additional scenarios for the catalog view, and it > >> >> is > >> >> quite difficult to come up with a one-solution-that-fits all solution > - > >> >> thanks for pointer Andrea - I'm trying to figure out how to handle > >> >> loads of > >> >> shapefiles from the local file system. > >> >> Quick question - in terms of a Shapefile, what would Feature Type be? > >> >> Is > >> >> it POINT, LINE or POLYGON or can it be something else? > >> >> Thanks > >> >> Mifan > >> >> > >> >> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Mifan Careem <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hi Andrea, > >> >> Sure - I'll put up some examples for the other types on the wiki. It > is > >> >> interesting since the view I had doesn't help a situation where there > >> >> are > >> >> say 100 shapefiles loaded from the filesystem, which still shows up > as > >> >> a 100 > >> >> shapefiles in the 'Service' view. > >> >> Mifan > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:13 AM, andrea antonello > >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hi Mifan, > >> >> can you make more examples of your wortkflow for different data > types? > >> >> You tend to make examples just with remote services and I want to > make > >> >> sure all the different types have a proper way to be handled. > >> >> > >> >> What would happen for example with: > >> >> - shapefiles > >> >> - folder of shapefiles > >> >> - tiff > >> >> - asc > >> >> - folder with tiff and asc > >> >> - folder with tiff and shapefiles > >> >> - postgis connection > >> >> - no4j connection (or H2 or sqlite) > >> >> -... any other thought? > >> >> > >> >> I can be around for IRC for about 1/2 an hour at the same time as > last > >> >> time. > >> >> > >> >> Ciao, > >> >> Andrea > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Mifan Careem <[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > HI All, > >> >> > Based on the last IRC breakout on the Catalog View, I've come up > with > >> >> > a > >> >> > 2nd > >> >> > draft of a possible view: > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/UDIG/GSoC+2011+-+Catalog+View+Reports#GSoC2011-CatalogViewReports-catalogscenario1 > >> >> > Scenario 1 here is trying to keep it as simple as possible, before > >> >> > moving to > >> >> > the multi-select (scenario 2) and configurable start components > >> >> > (scenario > >> >> > 3). I'd love to hear your thought on this and verify whether the > >> >> > thinking > >> >> > here is right. The use case for Scenario 1 is as follows: > >> >> > > >> >> > The catalog lists the Service Types (File, Database, Web Services, > >> >> > Other, > >> >> > Decorator). The other components (Service, DataType and Layers) are > >> >> > blank > >> >> > User selects the Web Services Service Type > >> >> > The Services component is then filled with the Services that fall > >> >> > under > >> >> > the > >> >> > selected Services Type (FGDC WMS, ESRI WMS, Geoserver WFS etc.) > >> >> > The user selects the MassGIS WFS. This populates the DataType > >> >> > component > >> >> > with > >> >> > the FeatureTypes. > >> >> > The user select the FeatureType. This loads the Layers relevant to > >> >> > the > >> >> > feature type. Usually this might be a 1:1 mapping > >> >> > > >> >> > Should we have another IRC to discuss this further? > >> >> > Cheers > >> >> > Mifan > >> >> > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Jody Garnett < > [email protected]> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Hi Mifan: > >> >> >> Sorry for joining the conversation late :-) I am very enthusiastic > >> >> >> about > >> >> >> your work - and also your questions as they will help motivate me > to > >> >> >> iron on > >> >> >> the wrinkles in the catalog api. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Services -> Layer -> Type > >> >> >> This is from Jody's original proposal. > >> >> >> Services would be a list of services that are loaded > >> >> >> Layers would be the layers > >> >> >> Types would be the types of layers > >> >> >> (An image is available in [2] named Version 3, under the June 10 > >> >> >> Weekly > >> >> >> Report) > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Small clarification; I was not sure what to really do for the last > >> >> >> column > >> >> >> as i had a number of "things" I wanted to communicate: > >> >> >> - type (as you indicated); the annoying part is that type forms a > >> >> >> "tree" > >> >> >> (with the vast majority of types simply extending feature) > >> >> >> - style (I have a change proposal I need to sort out on this > topic; > >> >> >> but > >> >> >> basically styles are organised by feature type - as feature type > >> >> >> indicates > >> >> >> what geometry and attributes are available to be drawn) > >> >> >> - friends (if the data was available via another service we > consider > >> >> >> both > >> >> >> layers to be "friends"). This is actually an "association" but > >> >> >> friends > >> >> >> makes > >> >> >> udig a more user-friendly experience :P > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > >> >> >> http://udig.refractions.net > >> >> >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > >> >> > http://udig.refractions.net > >> >> > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > >> >> http://udig.refractions.net > >> >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > >> >> http://udig.refractions.net > >> >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > >> >> http://udig.refractions.net > >> >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > >> > http://udig.refractions.net > >> > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > >> http://udig.refractions.net > >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > > http://udig.refractions.net > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > http://udig.refractions.net > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel >
_______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
