Hi Mifan, we are planning to hack un the new uDig release quite some time this weekend, so I am glad to hear we can chat at that time :)
Meet you there, Andrea On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Mifan Careem <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry - I will be travelling on Friday evening my time so that would be a > bit difficult. I am Ok for anytime on Saturday or Sunday if that is possible > - and if it wont eat into anyone's weekend plans :) > Cheers > Mifan > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:54 PM, andrea antonello > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Checking the time now ... Brisbane 2am? If I am still awake at that time >> > on >> > a friday I won't be on IRC :-) >> >> Well, what can be better than a nice relaxing IRC after an evening out >> dancing? :) >> >> No really, Mifan, I have thought about it and also seen your docs and >> I would need Jody to be present, since me and him have different ideas >> on certain parts. And I don't want to risk to stretch you one time on >> my side, the next on his and mess up your good work. >> So I would suggest another day. Could Friday work for you guys? >> >> Andrea >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > Jody Garnett >> > >> > On Wednesday, 29 June 2011 at 4:43 AM, Mifan Careem wrote: >> > >> > Hi Andrea, >> > That [1] would work for me - thanks. Hopefully Jody can join us as well >> > as >> > anyone else - the more the merrier. >> > 1 >> > >> > - http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=uDIG+IRC&iso=20110630T16&ah=1 >> > Cheers >> > Mifan >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:13 PM, andrea antonello >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Mifan, >> > >> >> Sorry - I'll be out at the newer time you have suggested. Would some >> >> other >> >> time work for you? Maybe later than the previous suggested time? Let me >> >> know. >> > >> > ok, let me try later. Would this work? >> > >> > >> > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=uDIG+IRC&iso=20110630T16&ah=1 >> > >> > The only thing I am afraid of, is that we will loose Jody's support, >> > which is always very valuable. >> > >> > I think an IRC now would be very important, so I would do it anyways >> > (Jody please don't be offended :)). >> > >> > Andrea >> > >> > >> >> Thanks >> >> Mifan >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:40 PM, andrea antonello >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hi Mifan, >> >>> thanks for all the updates. >> >>> >> >>> I have a problem with the IRC time, since I already have a bussiness >> >>> meeting in your proposed timeframe. Would it be possible to anticipate >> >>> by 3 hours? >> >>> >> >>> That would be: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=uDIG+IRC&iso=20110630T09&ah=1 >> >>> >> >>> Andrea >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Mifan Careem <[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> > I have come up with a revised version of the catalog browse view >> >>> > concept >> >>> > C >> >>> > here [1]. This is based on the shortcomings of the previous concept >> >>> > B >> >>> > here >> >>> > [2]. Please take a look at the suggestions. Hopefully this would >> >>> > solve >> >>> > most >> >>> > of the scenarios, if not all. >> >>> > I can explain this in detail in the IRC chat we plan to have on >> >>> > Thursday >> >>> > [3] >> >>> > to see whether this fits the bill. >> >>> > 1 >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > - http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/UDIG/GSoC+2011+-+Catalog+View+Reports#GSoC2011-CatalogViewReports-conceptc >> >>> > 2 >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > - http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/UDIG/GSoC+2011+-+Catalog+View+Reports#GSoC2011-CatalogViewReports-conceptb >> >>> > 3 >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > - http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=uDIG+IRC&iso=20110630T12&ah=1 >> >>> > Cheers >> >>> > Mifan >> >>> > >> >>> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jody Garnett >> >>> > <[email protected]> >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> The feature type is often the name of the file; and consists of the >> >>> >> attribute columns defined for that shapefile. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> -- >> >>> >> Jody Garnett >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Wednesday, 22 June 2011 at 9:17 PM, Mifan Careem wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Hi All, >> >>> >> I'm working on some additional scenarios for the catalog view, and >> >>> >> it >> >>> >> is >> >>> >> quite difficult to come up with a one-solution-that-fits all >> >>> >> solution >> >>> >> - >> >>> >> thanks for pointer Andrea - I'm trying to figure out how to handle >> >>> >> loads of >> >>> >> shapefiles from the local file system. >> >>> >> Quick question - in terms of a Shapefile, what would Feature Type >> >>> >> be? >> >>> >> Is >> >>> >> it POINT, LINE or POLYGON or can it be something else? >> >>> >> Thanks >> >>> >> Mifan >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Mifan Careem <[email protected]> >> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Hi Andrea, >> >>> >> Sure - I'll put up some examples for the other types on the wiki. >> >>> >> It >> >>> >> is >> >>> >> interesting since the view I had doesn't help a situation where >> >>> >> there >> >>> >> are >> >>> >> say 100 shapefiles loaded from the filesystem, which still shows up >> >>> >> as >> >>> >> a 100 >> >>> >> shapefiles in the 'Service' view. >> >>> >> Mifan >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:13 AM, andrea antonello >> >>> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Hi Mifan, >> >>> >> can you make more examples of your wortkflow for different data >> >>> >> types? >> >>> >> You tend to make examples just with remote services and I want to >> >>> >> make >> >>> >> sure all the different types have a proper way to be handled. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> What would happen for example with: >> >>> >> - shapefiles >> >>> >> - folder of shapefiles >> >>> >> - tiff >> >>> >> - asc >> >>> >> - folder with tiff and asc >> >>> >> - folder with tiff and shapefiles >> >>> >> - postgis connection >> >>> >> - no4j connection (or H2 or sqlite) >> >>> >> -... any other thought? >> >>> >> >> >>> >> I can be around for IRC for about 1/2 an hour at the same time as >> >>> >> last >> >>> >> time. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Ciao, >> >>> >> Andrea >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Mifan Careem <[email protected]> >> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> >> > HI All, >> >>> >> > Based on the last IRC breakout on the Catalog View, I've come up >> >>> >> > with >> >>> >> > a >> >>> >> > 2nd >> >>> >> > draft of a possible view: >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/UDIG/GSoC+2011+-+Catalog+View+Reports#GSoC2011-CatalogViewReports-catalogscenario1 >> >>> >> > Scenario 1 here is trying to keep it as simple as possible, >> >>> >> > before >> >>> >> > moving to >> >>> >> > the multi-select (scenario 2) and configurable start components >> >>> >> > (scenario >> >>> >> > 3). I'd love to hear your thought on this and verify whether the >> >>> >> > thinking >> >>> >> > here is right. The use case for Scenario 1 is as follows: >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > The catalog lists the Service Types (File, Database, Web >> >>> >> > Services, >> >>> >> > Other, >> >>> >> > Decorator). The other components (Service, DataType and Layers) >> >>> >> > are >> >>> >> > blank >> >>> >> > User selects the Web Services Service Type >> >>> >> > The Services component is then filled with the Services that fall >> >>> >> > under >> >>> >> > the >> >>> >> > selected Services Type (FGDC WMS, ESRI WMS, Geoserver WFS etc.) >> >>> >> > The user selects the MassGIS WFS. This populates the DataType >> >>> >> > component >> >>> >> > with >> >>> >> > the FeatureTypes. >> >>> >> > The user select the FeatureType. This loads the Layers relevant >> >>> >> > to >> >>> >> > the >> >>> >> > feature type. Usually this might be a 1:1 mapping >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > Should we have another IRC to discuss this further? >> >>> >> > Cheers >> >>> >> > Mifan >> >>> >> > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Jody Garnett >> >>> >> > <[email protected]> >> >>> >> > wrote: >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Hi Mifan: >> >>> >> >> Sorry for joining the conversation late :-) I am very >> >>> >> >> enthusiastic >> >>> >> >> about >> >>> >> >> your work - and also your questions as they will help motivate >> >>> >> >> me >> >>> >> >> to >> >>> >> >> iron on >> >>> >> >> the wrinkles in the catalog api. >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Services -> Layer -> Type >> >>> >> >> This is from Jody's original proposal. >> >>> >> >> Services would be a list of services that are loaded >> >>> >> >> Layers would be the layers >> >>> >> >> Types would be the types of layers >> >>> >> >> (An image is available in [2] named Version 3, under the June 10 >> >>> >> >> Weekly >> >>> >> >> Report) >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Small clarification; I was not sure what to really do for the >> >>> >> >> last >> >>> >> >> column >> >>> >> >> as i had a number of "things" I wanted to communicate: >> >>> >> >> - type (as you indicated); the annoying part is that type forms >> >>> >> >> a >> >>> >> >> "tree" >> >>> >> >> (with the vast majority of types simply extending feature) >> >>> >> >> - style (I have a change proposal I need to sort out on this >> >>> >> >> topic; >> >>> >> >> but >> >>> >> >> basically styles are organised by feature type - as feature type >> >>> >> >> indicates >> >>> >> >> what geometry and attributes are available to be drawn) >> >>> >> >> - friends (if the data was available via another service we >> >>> >> >> consider >> >>> >> >> both >> >>> >> >> layers to be "friends"). This is actually an "association" but >> >>> >> >> friends >> >>> >> >> makes >> >>> >> >> udig a more user-friendly experience :P >> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) >> >>> >> >> http://udig.refractions.net >> >>> >> >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) >> >>> >> > http://udig.refractions.net >> >>> >> > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) >> >>> >> http://udig.refractions.net >> >>> >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) >> >>> >> http://udig.refractions.net >> >>> >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) >> >>> >> http://udig.refractions.net >> >>> >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > _______________________________________________ >> >>> > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) >> >>> > http://udig.refractions.net >> >>> > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) >> >>> http://udig.refractions.net >> >>> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) >> >> http://udig.refractions.net >> >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel >> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) >> > http://udig.refractions.net >> > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) >> > http://udig.refractions.net >> > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) >> > http://udig.refractions.net >> > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) >> http://udig.refractions.net >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > http://udig.refractions.net > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > _______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
