Checking the time now ... Brisbane 2am? If I am still awake at that time on a friday I won't be on IRC :-)
-- Jody Garnett On Wednesday, 29 June 2011 at 4:43 AM, Mifan Careem wrote: > Hi Andrea, > > That [1] would work for me - thanks. Hopefully Jody can join us as well as > anyone else - the more the merrier. > > 1 - > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=uDIG+IRC&iso=20110630T16&ah=1 > > > Cheers > > Mifan > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:13 PM, andrea antonello <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > Hi Mifan, > > > > > Sorry - I'll be out at the newer time you have suggested. Would some other > > > time work for you? Maybe later than the previous suggested time? Let me > > > know. > > > > ok, let me try later. Would this work? > > > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=uDIG+IRC&iso=20110630T16&ah=1 > > > > The only thing I am afraid of, is that we will loose Jody's support, > > which is always very valuable. > > > > I think an IRC now would be very important, so I would do it anyways > > (Jody please don't be offended :)). > > > > Andrea > > > > > > > Thanks > > > Mifan > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:40 PM, andrea antonello > > > <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi Mifan, > > >> thanks for all the updates. > > >> > > >> I have a problem with the IRC time, since I already have a bussiness > > >> meeting in your proposed timeframe. Would it be possible to anticipate > > >> by 3 hours? > > >> > > >> That would be: > > >> > > >> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=uDIG+IRC&iso=20110630T09&ah=1 > > >> > > >> Andrea > > >> > > >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Mifan Careem <[email protected] > > >> (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > >> > I have come up with a revised version of the catalog browse view > > >> > concept > > >> > C > > >> > here [1]. This is based on the shortcomings of the previous concept B > > >> > here > > >> > [2]. Please take a look at the suggestions. Hopefully this would solve > > >> > most > > >> > of the scenarios, if not all. > > >> > I can explain this in detail in the IRC chat we plan to have on > > >> > Thursday > > >> > [3] > > >> > to see whether this fits the bill. > > >> > 1 > > >> > > > >> > - > > >> > http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/UDIG/GSoC+2011+-+Catalog+View+Reports#GSoC2011-CatalogViewReports-conceptc > > >> > 2 > > >> > > > >> > - > > >> > http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/UDIG/GSoC+2011+-+Catalog+View+Reports#GSoC2011-CatalogViewReports-conceptb > > >> > 3 > > >> > > > >> > - > > >> > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=uDIG+IRC&iso=20110630T12&ah=1 > > >> > Cheers > > >> > Mifan > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jody Garnett <[email protected] > > >> > (mailto:[email protected])> > > >> > wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> The feature type is often the name of the file; and consists of the > > >> >> attribute columns defined for that shapefile. > > >> >> > > >> >> -- > > >> >> Jody Garnett > > >> >> > > >> >> On Wednesday, 22 June 2011 at 9:17 PM, Mifan Careem wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> Hi All, > > >> >> I'm working on some additional scenarios for the catalog view, and it > > >> >> is > > >> >> quite difficult to come up with a one-solution-that-fits all solution > > >> >> - > > >> >> thanks for pointer Andrea - I'm trying to figure out how to handle > > >> >> loads of > > >> >> shapefiles from the local file system. > > >> >> Quick question - in terms of a Shapefile, what would Feature Type be? > > >> >> Is > > >> >> it POINT, LINE or POLYGON or can it be something else? > > >> >> Thanks > > >> >> Mifan > > >> >> > > >> >> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Mifan Careem <[email protected] > > >> >> (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> Hi Andrea, > > >> >> Sure - I'll put up some examples for the other types on the wiki. It > > >> >> is > > >> >> interesting since the view I had doesn't help a situation where there > > >> >> are > > >> >> say 100 shapefiles loaded from the filesystem, which still shows up as > > >> >> a 100 > > >> >> shapefiles in the 'Service' view. > > >> >> Mifan > > >> >> > > >> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:13 AM, andrea antonello > > >> >> <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> Hi Mifan, > > >> >> can you make more examples of your wortkflow for different data types? > > >> >> You tend to make examples just with remote services and I want to make > > >> >> sure all the different types have a proper way to be handled. > > >> >> > > >> >> What would happen for example with: > > >> >> - shapefiles > > >> >> - folder of shapefiles > > >> >> - tiff > > >> >> - asc > > >> >> - folder with tiff and asc > > >> >> - folder with tiff and shapefiles > > >> >> - postgis connection > > >> >> - no4j connection (or H2 or sqlite) > > >> >> -... any other thought? > > >> >> > > >> >> I can be around for IRC for about 1/2 an hour at the same time as last > > >> >> time. > > >> >> > > >> >> Ciao, > > >> >> Andrea > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Mifan Careem <[email protected] > > >> >> (mailto:[email protected])> > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > HI All, > > >> >> > Based on the last IRC breakout on the Catalog View, I've come up > > >> >> > with > > >> >> > a > > >> >> > 2nd > > >> >> > draft of a possible view: > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/UDIG/GSoC+2011+-+Catalog+View+Reports#GSoC2011-CatalogViewReports-catalogscenario1 > > >> >> > Scenario 1 here is trying to keep it as simple as possible, before > > >> >> > moving to > > >> >> > the multi-select (scenario 2) and configurable start components > > >> >> > (scenario > > >> >> > 3). I'd love to hear your thought on this and verify whether the > > >> >> > thinking > > >> >> > here is right. The use case for Scenario 1 is as follows: > > >> >> > > > >> >> > The catalog lists the Service Types (File, Database, Web Services, > > >> >> > Other, > > >> >> > Decorator). The other components (Service, DataType and Layers) are > > >> >> > blank > > >> >> > User selects the Web Services Service Type > > >> >> > The Services component is then filled with the Services that fall > > >> >> > under > > >> >> > the > > >> >> > selected Services Type (FGDC WMS, ESRI WMS, Geoserver WFS etc.) > > >> >> > The user selects the MassGIS WFS. This populates the DataType > > >> >> > component > > >> >> > with > > >> >> > the FeatureTypes. > > >> >> > The user select the FeatureType. This loads the Layers relevant to > > >> >> > the > > >> >> > feature type. Usually this might be a 1:1 mapping > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Should we have another IRC to discuss this further? > > >> >> > Cheers > > >> >> > Mifan > > >> >> > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Jody Garnett > > >> >> > <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> > > >> >> > wrote: > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> Hi Mifan: > > >> >> >> Sorry for joining the conversation late :-) I am very enthusiastic > > >> >> >> about > > >> >> >> your work - and also your questions as they will help motivate me > > >> >> >> to > > >> >> >> iron on > > >> >> >> the wrinkles in the catalog api. > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> Services -> Layer -> Type > > >> >> >> This is from Jody's original proposal. > > >> >> >> Services would be a list of services that are loaded > > >> >> >> Layers would be the layers > > >> >> >> Types would be the types of layers > > >> >> >> (An image is available in [2] named Version 3, under the June 10 > > >> >> >> Weekly > > >> >> >> Report) > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> Small clarification; I was not sure what to really do for the last > > >> >> >> column > > >> >> >> as i had a number of "things" I wanted to communicate: > > >> >> >> - type (as you indicated); the annoying part is that type forms a > > >> >> >> "tree" > > >> >> >> (with the vast majority of types simply extending feature) > > >> >> >> - style (I have a change proposal I need to sort out on this topic; > > >> >> >> but > > >> >> >> basically styles are organised by feature type - as feature type > > >> >> >> indicates > > >> >> >> what geometry and attributes are available to be drawn) > > >> >> >> - friends (if the data was available via another service we > > >> >> >> consider > > >> >> >> both > > >> >> >> layers to be "friends"). This is actually an "association" but > > >> >> >> friends > > >> >> >> makes > > >> >> >> udig a more user-friendly experience :P > > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > > >> >> >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > > >> >> >> http://udig.refractions.net > > >> >> >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > _______________________________________________ > > >> >> > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > > >> >> > http://udig.refractions.net > > >> >> > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> _______________________________________________ > > >> >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > > >> >> http://udig.refractions.net > > >> >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> _______________________________________________ > > >> >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > > >> >> http://udig.refractions.net > > >> >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> _______________________________________________ > > >> >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > > >> >> http://udig.refractions.net > > >> >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > _______________________________________________ > > >> > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > > >> > http://udig.refractions.net > > >> > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > >> > > > >> > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > > >> http://udig.refractions.net > > >> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > > > http://udig.refractions.net > > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > > http://udig.refractions.net > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > _______________________________________________ > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > http://udig.refractions.net > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
_______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
