> Andrea I can confirm that 2.7.7 was not included; however I did not go to
> any extra effort to exclude it - so one of the upstream repositories must no
> longer require it.
> If you are sure you need it then please add it as an explicit dependency in
> refresh.xml; previously I think we were only getting it as a transitive
> dependency on antlr 3.3 or something?

Hold on a sec. You mean when exporting the product or when running refresh?
I mean the first case, which I thought would depend only on the
build.xml entries.

For the second case, I am quite sure that the 2.7.7 should still
download as a dependency, since the antlr version 3.3 has not changed.
I am running full build right now in order to make sure. The 2.7.7 is
definitely required by the toolbox so I will add it if it doesn't
download. But my guess is that it downloads, but then doesn't export.
Mind that we have it also listed in the manifest, so it really should
be ther.


Andrea


>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On Thursday, 7 July 2011 at 9:44 PM, andrea antonello wrote:
>
> it is checked in the build.xml?  I would expect it to be exported in that
> case... Odd.
>
> Yes, that was my thought also. But in fact it was not. I took the
> chance of a workspace corrruption to install the new Indigo. I have to
> say that the export took at least twice the time it used to. So I am
> wondering if I have something screwed up.
> It is not a big trouble right now, I will look into it. It is just
> that I would like whoever will do the export (speak Jody :) ) to check
> please, since the antlr 2.7.7 is not needed by udig I think (and the
> usual tests would not show the problem), but it is absolutely needed
> to use inside the spatial toolbox jaitools dependent modules.
>
> Andrea
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:55 AM, andrea antonello
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> As the subject says. When I export the udig product, I find myself
> without the antlr 2.7.7 in the libs folder.
> The jar is checked to be exported and I have no idea right now why it
> is not exported. Anyone with the same problem?
>
> Just a heads up to please check when release is done.
>
> Andrea
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
http://udig.refractions.net
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel

Reply via email to