> Yes, it is probably me, but that is what I am trying to say. There > won't be API change. One plugin is added which bases on the RCP > texteditor.
Okay I under stand now :-) > Sorry, I didn't want to sound rude. > I just have the feeling that uDig lives in too much burocracy and QA, > while we have issues and no manpower to solve important issues, > showstopping bugs and release problems. I hear you; I was quite disappointed our release party did not work out in December :( I am keen to look at recruiting more developers under the location tech banner (and am glad that is moving along). I find the "procedures" about normal for an open source project, but I think we could cut down on the description to make them easier to follow. > I am doing this work *without* funding. We do it to continue to > improve the processing part of uDig, in the hope to attract > contributors. If the hassle of creating (maybe even already existing) > documentation is too big, contributions will not make it to the show. > We really need to find a better equilibrium in this. I am hesitant to add functionality without documentation (or video?) providing a clue on how to use it. Jody
_______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
