Adam Lally wrote:
<snip> Even if there's no technical barrier (seeing as svn realizes branches and tags as copies anyway), to me it's a more natural mental model if branches/tags actually correspond to a single artifact that will be / has been released together.
I think the bottom line is that both approaches can be argued for - I don't have strong preference, except I do like to (in general) split up things into more manageable-sized chunks. So, I think I would come down on the side of having separate top-level projects for the uima-java and uima-cpp things - they're pretty big pieces of code.
Maybe this means we might want a project for "smaller" things that don't belong in
either one (like the docbook). We could collect these things into a general top-level thing called uima-shared - and if it got too big, we could consider splitting it. -Marshall
