On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The current situation is that we have in SVN copies of the docs (Javadocs, > plus docbook docs in html and pdf format) for all releases (of UIMA). < > Well, that's not quite accurate - some of the previous releases didn't have > all the docs put up on the web site apparently >. But we only provide links > on our website to the "current" release of the Javadocs, even though we have > the older releases available. > > This seems inconsistent; we should either have pointers to all the docs for > all the releases, or, if we decide not to provide links to other than the > current release, we should not burden the website with storing the older > releases (even though the storage of these in SVN cannot be reclaimed). >
I agree it doesn't make much sense the way it is now. > If we continue to store copies of the expanded release docs as entities in > our SVN in the web-site project so we can have them available on the web > site, I would prefer that we change the website to have links to all the > documentation for all the releases that is available in SVN. These could be > categorized to reduce clutter. Other opinions? > That seems okay to me. I don't have a strong feeling either way. -Adam
