Rico Landefeld wrote: > Hi Jörn, > > thank you for your hints. I'm currently working hard on a new release of > Lucas. I know that some tests need refactoring and the exception > handling isn't perfect. I'll do my best do get this done in the new > release, which should be available next week.
I'd hold off on that. We're voting on the version that's now in Jira, and if the vote goes through (which seems certain at this point), that is the version that will go in the repository. All improvements after that will have to come in via the regular processes, and it'll be a major PITA for you to do that merge. I'll close the vote later today, it's been open long enough. We'll still need to go through some other administrativa though before we can commit the code. --Thilo > > Rico >> Hello everyone, >> >> I also vote +1 but the code has to be improved before I would >> vote +1 for a release. Especially the exception handling should make >> use of javas managed exceptions and in one place a I saw >> some code which was copied over and over again. >> >> Jörn >> >> On Mar 4, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote: >> >>> Please vote to accept the contribution of the Lucene >>> CAS indexer into the sandbox. See Jira issue UIMA-1299 >>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1299) for >>> the tar ball. >>> >>> [ ] +1 Accept Lucene CAS indexer into UIMA sandbox >>> [ ] -1 Do not accept contribution of Lucene CAS indexer >>> >>> You're all encouraged to vote, even if you're not a >>> UIMA committer. If you vote to reject the contribution, >>> please remember to give a reason. >>> >>> --Thilo >> > >
