Well, I was going to bring one along. Don't worry, we don't make them :-) but their techies actually came down to our offices and worked with our test LNS to iron out the bugs on the IPv6 side.
Sent from my iPad2 On 14 Jan 2012, at 10:21, "Neil J. McRae" <n...@domino.org> wrote: > Adrian would love to hear more about this box might be a good presentation > for the next UKNOF ? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 14 Jan 2012, at 09:28, "Adrian Kennard" <uk...@k.gg> wrote: > >> On 2012-01-13 23:49, Paul M wrote: >>> I have an interesting idea. A lot of these consumer grade CPEs haven't >>> sufficient ROM/RAM to do dual stack. So, throw out the IPv4 stack >>> altogether. Get rid of the nat, port mapping, all the crappy broken >>> SIP ALGs etc, everything required to make room. >>> >>> Leave only IPv6, with stateful firewall. >>> >>> Then, have the ISP do some magic* to make IPv4 visible. >>> * I'll leave it as an exercise to those more sober and less tired to >>> solve that problem. But I guess it'd mean some clever DNS >>> capture/re-map for all locations which don't have AAAA addresses, >>> remap them to a local 6 to 4 "proxy". >>> >>> how hard can it be :-D >> >> Well, yes, but there is now at least one relatively inexpensive CPE that >> does IPv6 and works. So the problem is going away at last. >> >> >> >
