To take this thread full circle... On 13 January 2016 at 10:43, Alistair C <uk...@imf2000.org> wrote: > This appears to have thrown up an interesting problem in so far that turning > to integrated devices such as the Cisco 887VA-M or Cisco 897 which are > "approved and certified for use with BT GEA/FTTC and compliant with SIN498", > do not appear to support q-in-q across the VDSL ethernet interface.
Turns out they do, I didn't have one to hand. I logged onto a remote 887VA-M, it didn't *seem* to work. Someone else had an 897, this is now live and working: interface Ethernet0 no ip address ! interface Ethernet0.400 encapsulation dot1Q 101 second-dot1q 400 ip vrf forwarding test ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.252 ! interface Ethernet0.401 encapsulation dot1Q 101 second-dot1q 401 ip vrf forwarding test-2 ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.252 Cheers, James.
