On 3 February 2016 at 11:43, James Bensley <jwbens...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To take this thread full circle... > > On 13 January 2016 at 10:43, Alistair C <uk...@imf2000.org> wrote: > > This appears to have thrown up an interesting problem in so far that > turning > > to integrated devices such as the Cisco 887VA-M or Cisco 897 which are > > "approved and certified for use with BT GEA/FTTC and compliant with > SIN498", > > do not appear to support q-in-q across the VDSL ethernet interface. > > > Turns out they do, I didn't have one to hand. I logged onto a remote > 887VA-M, it didn't *seem* to work. Someone else had an 897, this is > now live and working Yes, Cisco confirmed it working with the 897 this morning, does not appear to work with the 887VA-M with a recent IOS, buyer beware. (config-subif)#encapsulation dot1Q 101 sec? % Unrecognised command" Zhone VDSL2 routers in bridge mode, running the latest firmware, also appear to work well as a drop in replacement for the BT VDSL2 modems, for those who need VLAN trunking on other devices. -- Alistair Cockeram
