Nitai Sasson via Unicode ([email protected]) wrote: > Allow me to just point out the option of continuing to use ">>" for this > purpose > I agree. The use of two GREATER THAN characters is just a way to emulate a rightwards arrow using ASCII graphics. That’s OK when you are limited to ASCII, but when you can use Unicode, there are several arrow or arrowhead characters to choose from. There is no point in adding a Unicode character for the “ASCII graphics” >>,
Yucca, https://jkorpela.fi
