Op za 26-07-2025 om 23:55 schreef Doug Ewell via Unicode:
If one is looking for an existing character that looks like >>, but isn't a sequence of the two characters > and >, here are some suggested steps to take before one concludes that a New Character Must Be Proposed:
Characters may look useful in one font, but not in other fonts. Are you going to check them in all fonts? If a new character with a name describing its usage is introduced, we don't have that problem.
-- Alex.
