Re: Java and Unicode

[Roozbeh Pournader]

On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote:

> I do not think they are so theoretical, with both 10646 and Unicode
> including them in the very new future (unless you count it as theoretical
> when you drop an egg but it has not yet hit the ground!).

Lemme think. You're saying that when I have not even seen a single egg
hitting the ground, I should believe that it will hit some day? ;)