Re: Java and Unicode

[John Jenkins]

On Wednesday, November 15, 2000, at 12:08 PM, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:

> 
> 
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote:
> 
> > I do not think they are so theoretical, with both 10646 and Unicode
> > including them in the very new future (unless you count it as 
> theoretical
> > when you drop an egg but it has not yet hit the ground!).
> 
> Lemme think. You're saying that when I have not even seen a single egg
> hitting the ground, I should believe that it will hit some day? ;)
> 
> 

Well, you should be expecting about 45,000 eggs within the next six months.