Tex Texin scripsit: > I would rather say simply that Unicode is the only character set > that exists for certain markets. I believe this is true, but > would like to have at least a few examples of scripts or > languages that have no other code pages but Unicode. > I have in mind Inuktitut and perhaps Byzantine music, but its > a bit hard to establish that there are no other code pages. Oh sure. The point is that ISCII does exist, but Microsoft does not support it: therefore, if you are going to do Indic languages, you must have Unicode (for Microsoft environments, anyway). -- John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore --Douglas Hofstadter
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode DougEwell2
- RE: benefits of unicode Marco Cimarosti
- RE: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Peter_Constable
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Peter_Constable
- Re: benefits of unicode Edward Cherlin
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael Everson
- Re: benefits of unicode John Cowan
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: benefits of unicode Yves Arrouye
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: benefits of unicode Andrew Cunningham
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan