Michael,
Isn't this covered by the second benefit on the page?
Reduced development costs, etc....
tex
"Michael (michka) Kaplan" wrote:
> It DOES, however, underscore the fact that Unicode support is so much easier
> than supporting every random code page that the only reasonable way vendors
> can keep up with every single market is to have a good story for Unicode
> support.
>
> Certainly if there is no business case for a company like Microsoft or IBM
> or Progress (<g>) to support a particular non-standard code page, but then
> Unicode supports the script, then suddenly there is an avenue to support the
> script, right?
>
> michka
--
According to Murphy, nothing goes according to Hoyle.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tex Texin Director, International Business
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-781-280-4271 Fax:+1-781-280-4655
Progress Software Corp. 14 Oak Park, Bedford, MA 01730
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sign up now for PROGRESS Worldwide Exchange 2001-Jun-03..07, Washington
DC.
http://www.progress.com/exchange
