"John H. Jenkins" wrote: > > At 7:07 PM -0700 7/2/01, Richard Cook wrote: > >Evidence? There's ample evidence, starting c. 1000 BC, with > >[U+5468][U+6613] _Zhou Yi_ (aka _Yi Jing_ aka _I Ching_ aka _The Book of > >Changes_), an artifact of the Zhou Dynasty ... > > > > I agree with Richard here. It's silly to have the trigrams and not > the hexagrams, although I know why it worked out that way. Richard, > are they used much *outside* of the Yi? If so, I think it's > reasonable to add them. I think this PDF makes the traditional arrangement more explicit: http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/~rscook/pdf/64Gua-TradOrder-dec.pdf
- New characters query Edward Cherlin
- Re: New characters query Michael Everson
- Re: New characters query Edward Cherlin
- Re: New characters query てんどうりゅうじ
- Re: New characters query Richard Cook
- Re: New characters query John H. Jenkins
- Re: New characters query Jon Babcock
- Re: 64 Hexagrams, was re: New characters q... Richard Cook
- Re: New characters query Richard Cook
- Re: New characters query Rick McGowan
- Hexagrams (was Re: New characters query) Edward Cherlin
- Re: New characters query Richard Cook
- Re: New characters query Michael Everson
- Re: New characters query Richard Cook
- Re: New characters query Michael Everson
- Re: New characters query John Cowan
- Re: New characters query Richard Cook