Hi John,

The IDs correspond exactly to Microsoft's (proprietary) LCID ("locale ID")
codes used in the Windows operating systems. So they are a "Microsoft
standard".

Best Regards,

Addison

Addison P. Phillips
Globalization Architect / Manager, Globalization Engineering
webMethods, Inc.  432 Lakeside Drive, Sunnyvale, CA
+1 408.962.5487 (phone)  +1 408.210.3659 (mobile)
-------------------------------------------------
Internationalization is an architecture. It is not a feature.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of jgo
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 4:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RTF language codes
>
>
> I was reading:
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/specs/rtfspec_16.htm#rtfspec_34
>
> and trying to figure out the RTF language codes when I found:
> "The following table defines the standard languages used by Microsoft.
> This table was generated by the Unicode group for use with TrueType
> and Unicode.
> Language        ID (hexadecimal)   ID (decimal)
> Afrikaans       0x0436              1078
> Albanian        0x041c              1052
> Arabic          0x0401              1025
> Arabic Algeria  0x1401              5121
> Arabic Bahrain  0x3c01             15361...
> Xhosa           0x0434              1076
> Yiddish         0x043d              1085
> Zulu            0x0435              1077"
>
> I don't see such a table via search from the Unicode site.
> Is this just another M$ non-standard "standard" subject to
> change at a whim?  (Does the consortium have anything to do
> with it at all?)
>
> Since I'm trying to use it with MacOS 9-, how does this fit
> with Apple's script and region codes... or does it?  (And
> where can I find those, if so?)
>
> John G. Otto                             Nisus Software, Engineering
> www.infoclick.com  www.mathhelp.com  www.nisus.com  software4usa.com
> EasyAlarms  PowerSleuth  NisusEMail  NisusWriter  MailKeeper  QUED/M
>                                                    Will
> program Macs for food.
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to