Michael Everson wrote on 04/03/2003 07:34:53 AM:
Peter, I often suggest this, and you rarely take me up on it
I take you up on it when it suits what I need to do.
Well if you want people to give accurate advice based on analysis of actual glyph forms you need to make the information available to them.
And I mean L2/WG2 documents in PDF format, not a web-page with gifs that take forever to load. I was unable to review your tresillo/cuatrillo document for this reason.
> What "a bunch of base-ogonek characters" could mean is a mystery to me.
A bunch of ogonek-modified characters: a-ogonek, c-ogonek, e-ogonek, schwa-ogonek, etc.
I've gone back and reread your original post and I still don't have enough information to have an opinion. Sorry if it doesn't suit you to publish a paper on this topic.
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
