We never put the 2.0 Standard online. We do, of course, keep copies in our office, but your best bet is to borrow one from a collegue.
Mark __________________________________ http://www.macchiato.com ► “Eppur si muove” ◄ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barry Caplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:14 Subject: Re: conformance for unicode 2.x? > Thanks Mark, but I had done all that online searching before I posted to the list. Is the book (which I no longer have a copy of) the only place where the details for conformance for 2.x are archived? > > If so, is that a good idea? > > Barry > > At 11:09 AM 6/5/2003 -0700, Mark Davis wrote: > > >If you start on http://www.unicode.org/ and click on Start Here, > >you'll get to a page about the Unicode Standard. > > > >In the left-hand column, clicking on Versions of the Unicode Standard > >will get you to http://www.unicode.org/standard/versions/. > > > >In the left-hand column you will see the different versions of the > >standards. Unicode 2.1.9 takes you to > >http://www.unicode.org/standard/versions/enumeratedversions.html#Unic ode_2_1_9, > >where you will find the major and minor references. If you look in the > >book, you'll find conformance is chapter 3. > > > >The Unicode Consortium. The Unicode Standard, Version 2.0 > >Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley Developers Press, 1996. ISBN > >0-201-48345-9. > > > >Clauses may be amended by: > > > >Moore, Lisa. Unicode Technical Report #8, The Unicode Standard, > >Version 2.1, Revision 2. Cupertino, CA, The Unicode Consortium, 1998. > > > >Mark > >__________________________________ > >http://www.macchiato.com > >⺠â?oEppur si muoveâ? â-" > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Barry Caplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:34 > >Subject: conformance for unicode 2.x? > > > > > >> I was trying to find the place on unicode.org where conformance for > >2.x is defined. I think one of the 2.1.x updates referred back to > >earlier conformance specs, but I couldn't find them. Any pointers? > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> Barry > >> > >> > >> > > >
