>> >My question is more related to the requirements to display such a logo. >> After >> >all, one could use this logo on a web site that uses a standardized >> encoding >> >like ISO-8859-1 >> >> Why would you think that when the logo page says it must be UTF-8? > >No, the page suggests UTF-8 or an encoding form that complies with >Unicode... >(So I think it includes ISO-8859-1 which enough for most >European languages, >but still allows to use non Latin-1 characters as the >HTML/XML standard defines >character entities which is a particular way to >specify Unicode codepoints.)
I wonder about this. The Unicode FAQ makes the point that some browsers will not display NCR's unless the charset is UTF-8. It does seem logical that, NCR's or not, a page with the logo should be in one of the three standard Unicode Encoding Forms, UTF-8, 16, or 32.
