William Overington wrote on 06/24/2003 05:32:56 AM: > In that the document proposes U+2693 for FLEUR-DE-LIS it would seem not > unreasonable for fontmakers now to be able to produce fonts having a > FLEUR-DE-LIS glyph at U+2693.
Bad idea. Bad William. No biscuit. > However, what is the correct approach? No, it is not. The correct approach is to first get something encoded in the standard, then create fonts with it at the assigned codepoint. If you want to put it in a font in the meantime, use a PUA codepoint, or create a font with a different encoding, such as a symbol font. Putting this at U+2693 in a unicode-encode font violates conformance requirements. - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485
