Jony Rosenne wrote:

Cursive Hebrew, Rashi and Square Hebrew are only font variations and should
not be separately encoded.


Definitely. If you tried my "experiment" with examples from these or other Hebrew fonts, people would have no trouble reading them. Even Rashi script with non-Rashi-educated Hebrew-speakers; maybe they'd have some trouble, but they'd be able to make out some/most letters (Rashi script is probably a lot easier for a Square-Hebrew reader than SÃtterlin is for a Times-Roman reader).

~mark





Reply via email to