Kent Karlsson <kent dot karlsson14 at telia dot com> wrote: > I see absolutely no point in reencoding the digits 0-9 even though > 9 is (strangely) used to denote the value that is usually denoted 10. > That is just a (very strange) usage, not different characters from > the ordinary 0-9.
I suggested encoding all of them because U+0030 through U+0039 have the Nd nature. Remember, this is just for the ConScript registry, not for "real" Unicode, so it's more of an exercise than anything. -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s
