Since no-one else seems to have responded to Luke...
Den 2010-07-30 22.09, skrev "Luke-Jr" <l...@dashjr.org>:
> This isn't about them not looking *exactly* the same, it's about these
> existing modifiers being inconsistent with each other in visibly noticable
> ways.
That is most certainly a font issue, likely a font substitution issue
(several system try to substitute another font if a glyph is missing for
some codepoint in the font you selected). Indeed, superscript characters
may not have been given all that much attention w.r.t. consistency review
(within each font), especially not between Unicode blocks... (But that is
just my suspicion!)
/kent k
