Den 2010-08-05 00.20, skrev "Doug Ewell" <d...@ewellic.org>:
> Kent Karlsson <kent dot karlsson14 at telia dot com> wrote:
>
>> I see absolutely no point in reencoding the digits 0-9 even though
>> 9 is (strangely) used to denote the value that is usually denoted 10.
>> That is just a (very strange) usage, not different characters from
>> the ordinary 0-9.
>
> I suggested encoding all of them because U+0030 through U+0039 have the
> Nd nature.
That does not prevent anyone from using them for (ordinary) hexadecimal,
octal, etc.
> Remember, this is just for the ConScript registry, not for
> "real" Unicode, so it's more of an exercise than anything.
I know.
/kent k
