On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Naena Guru <naenag...@gmail.com> wrote: > I should not have even said anything here as I know that there is an > alternative approach that does not hurt Unicode and hopefully its fans.
I already told you that your approach cost Project Gutenberg time and effort. In fact, had it been a new font encoding instead of a variant on a old DOS code page, we possibly would have tossed that project and all that work had been done on it. > Standards compliant and > elegant solution. See it here: > www.lovatasinhala.com/ > Do not use IE. If you use Firefox, sometimes you need to pick another page > to see the complex script. It's not standards compliant. If it doesn't work on IE, and sometimes doesn't work on Firefox, then it hardly qualifies as a solution in my book, especially as I'm getting "nivahal heøa" as the label on its tag and complete trash when I paste it into my xterm. -- Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero.
