There’s no redeeming this orthography. 

> On 19 Jan 2018, at 13:42, Philippe Verdy via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hmmm.... that character exists already at 0+0315 (a combining comma above 
> right). It would work for the new Kazah orthographic system, including for 
> collation purpose.  I don't think IDN rejects this combining version.
> 
> 
> 2018-01-19 14:37 GMT+01:00 Philippe Verdy <verd...@wanadoo.fr>:
> May be the IDN could accept a new combining diacritic (sort of right-side 
> acute accent). After all the Kazakh intent is not to define a new separate 
> character but a modification of base letter to create a single letter in 
> their alphabet.
> So a proposal for COMBINING APOSTROPHE (whose spacing non-combining version 
> is 02BC), so that SPACE+COMBINING APOSTROPHE will render exactly like 02BC
> 
> 2018-01-18 19:51 GMT+01:00 Asmus Freytag via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org>:
> Top level IDN domain names can not contain 02BC, nor 0027 or 2019. 
> 
> (RFC 6912 gives the rationale and RZ-LGR the implementation, see MSR-3)
> 
> A./
> 
> 
> On 1/18/2018 3:00 AM, Andre Schappo via Unicode wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 18 Jan 2018, at 08:21, Andre Schappo via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 16 Jan 2018, at 08:00, Richard Wordingham via Unicode 
>>>> <unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 20:16:21 -0800
>>>> James Kass via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> It will probably be the ASCII apostrophe.  The stated intent favors
>>>>> the apostrophe over diacritics or special characters to ensure that
>>>>> the language can be input to computers with standard keyboards.
>>>> 
>>>> Typing U+0027 into a word processor takes planning.  Of the three, it
>>>> should obviously be the modifier letter U+02BC, but I think what gets
>>>> stored will be U+0027 or the single quotation mark U+2019.
>>>> 
>>>> However, we shouldn't overlook the diacritic mark U+0315 COMBINING COMMA
>>>> ABOVE RIGHT.
>>>> 
>>>> Richard.
>>> 
>>> I have just tested twitter hashtags and as one would expect, U+02BC does 
>>> not break hashtags. See twitter.com/andreschappo/status/953903964722024448
>>> 
>> 
>> ...and, just in case twitter.com/andreschappo/status/953944089896083456
>> 
>> André Schappo
>> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to