On 7 March 2018 at 22:18, Philippe Verdy via Unicode <[email protected]> wrote: > > Additional note: the UCS will never large enough to support the personal > signatures of billions Chinese people living today or born since milleniums, > or jsut those to be born in the next century. There's a need to represent > these names using composed strings. A reasonable compositing/ligaturing > process can then present almost all of them !
CJK characters invented for writing personal names are extremely rare, and do not constitute a significant fraction of CJK ideographs proposed for encoding. The majority of unencoded modern-use characters in China (that are not systematic simplified forms of existing encoded characters) are used in place names or in Chinese dialects or for writing non-Chinese languages such as Zhuang. Andrew
