|
On 6/8/2018 5:01 AM, Michael Everson
via Unicode wrote:
and achieving a fullscale merger with ISO/IEC 15897, after which the valid data stay hosted entirely in CLDR, and ISO/IEC 15897 would be its ISO mirror.I wonder if Mark Davis will be quick to agree with me 😅 when I say that ISO/IEC 15897 has no use and should be withdrawn I don't know about Mark, but that would have
been my position. There's no value added in creating "mirrors"
of something that is successfully being developed and maintained
under a different umbrella. A./
|
- Re: The Unicode Standard and ISO Michael Everson via Unicode
- Re: The Unicode Standard and ISO Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: The Unicode Standard and ISO Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
- Re: The Unicode Standard and ISO Michael Everson via Unicode
- Re: The Unicode Standard and ISO Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: The Unicode Standard and ISO Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: The Unicode Standard and ISO Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: The Unicode Standard and I... Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: The Unicode Standard and ISO Michael Everson via Unicode
- Re: The Unicode Standard and I... Andrew West via Unicode
- Re: The Unicode Standard and I... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- RE: The Unicode Standard and ISO via Unicode
- RE: The Unicode Standard and ISO Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: The Unicode Standard and ISO Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: The Unicode Standard and ISO Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
- Re: The Unicode Standard and I... Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: The Unicode Standard a... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: The Unicode Stand... Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: The Unicode Standard a... Steven R. Loomis via Unicode
- Re: The Unicode Stand... Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: The Unicode Standard and ISO Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode

