> > From the outset, Unicode and the US national body tried repeatedly to > > engage with SC35 and SC35/WG5, […] > As a reminder: The actual SC35 is in total disconnect from the same SC35 as > it was from the mid-eighties to mid-nineties and beyond.
Edit: ISO/IEC JTC1 SC35 was founded in 1999. (In the mentioned timespan, there was SC18/WG9.) > > informing them of UTS #35 (LDML) and CLDR, but were ignored. SC35 didn’t > > appear to be interested > [, or appeared to be interested in ] > > a pet project and not in what is actually being used in industry. It seems it isn’t even a pet project, today it’s just nothing but a deplorable mismanagement mess. In my opinion, at some point the inadvertant French NB will apologize to the US National Body and to the Unicode Consortium. As of now, I apologize for my part. Best regards, Marcel
