Marcel, You have put words into my mouth. Please don’t. Your description of what I said is NOT accurate.
> On 12 Jun 2018, at 03:53, Marcel Schneider via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> > wrote: > > And in this thread I wanted to demonstrate that by focusing on the wrong > priorities, i.e. legacy character names instead of the practicability of > on-going encoding and the accurateness of specified decompositions—so that in > some instances cedilla was used instead of comma below, Michael pointed out—, > ISO/IEC JTC1 SC2/WG2 failed to do its part and missed its mission—and thus > didn’t inspire a desire of extensive cooperation (and damaged the reputation > of the whole ISO/IEC).
