> On 15 Jan 2019, at 02:18, Richard Wordingham via Unicode > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:02:05 -0800 > Asmus Freytag via Unicode <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 1/14/2019 3:37 PM, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote: >> On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:02:49 +0100 >> Hans Åberg via Unicode <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 14 Jan 2019, at 23:43, James Kass via Unicode >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hans Åberg wrote, >> >> How about using U+0301 COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT: 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒́ >> >> Thought about using a combining accent. Figured it would just >> display with a dotted circle but neglected to try it out first. It >> actually renders perfectly here. /That's/ good to know. (smile) >> >> It is a bit off here. One can try math, too: the derivative of 𝛾(𝑡) >> is 𝛾̇(𝑡). >> >> No it isn't. You should be using a spacing character for >> differentiation. >> >> Sorry, but there may be different conventions. The dot / double-dot >> above is definitely common usage in physics.
Also in differential geometry, as for curves. >> A./ > > Apologies. It was positioned in the parenthesis, and it looked like a > misplaced U+0301. In MacOS, one can drop the combined character into the character table, and see that it is U+0307 COMBINING DOT ABOVE. It comes out right when typeset in ConTeXt.
