On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:02:05 -0800 Asmus Freytag via Unicode <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 1/14/2019 3:37 PM, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:02:49 +0100 > Hans Åberg via Unicode <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 14 Jan 2019, at 23:43, James Kass via Unicode > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hans Åberg wrote, > > How about using U+0301 COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT: 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒́ > > Thought about using a combining accent. Figured it would just > display with a dotted circle but neglected to try it out first. It > actually renders perfectly here. /That's/ good to know. (smile) > > It is a bit off here. One can try math, too: the derivative of 𝛾(𝑡) > is 𝛾̇(𝑡). > > No it isn't. You should be using a spacing character for > differentiation. > > Sorry, but there may be different conventions. The dot / double-dot > above is definitely common usage in physics. > > A./ Apologies. It was positioned in the parenthesis, and it looked like a misplaced U+0301. Richard.
