Re: A last missing link for interoperable representation

Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:03:51 -0800

On 1/14/2019 3:37 PM, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:02:49 +0100
Hans Åberg via Unicode <[email protected]> wrote:


On 14 Jan 2019, at 23:43, James Kass via Unicode
<[email protected]> wrote:

Hans Åberg wrote,
  

How about using U+0301 COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT: 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒́  

Thought about using a combining accent.  Figured it would just
display with a dotted circle but neglected to try it out first.  It
actually renders perfectly here.  /That's/ good to know.  (smile)  

It is a bit off here. One can try math, too: the derivative of 𝛾(𝑡)
is 𝛾̇(𝑡).

No it isn't.  You should be using a spacing character for
differentiation.

Sorry, but there may be different conventions. The dot / double-dot above is definitely common usage in physics.

A./


 On the other hand, one uses a combining circumflex
for Fourier transforms.

Richard.


Reply via email to