Re: A last missing link for interoperable representation

[Asmus Freytag via Unicode]

On 1/14/2019 3:37 PM, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:02:49 +0100 Hans Åberg via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> wrote: On 14 Jan 2019, at 23:43, James Kass via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> wrote: Hans Åberg wrote, How about using U+0301 COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT: 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒́ Thought about using a combining accent. Figured it would just display with a dotted circle but neglected to try it out first. It actually renders perfectly here. /That's/ good to know. (smile) It is a bit off here. One can try math, too: the derivative of 𝛾(𝑡) is 𝛾̇(𝑡). No it isn't. You should be using a spacing character for differentiation. Sorry, but there may be different conventions. The dot / double-dot above is definitely common usage in physics. A./ On the other hand, one uses a combining circumflex for Fourier transforms. Richard.