Well, no, in this case "strange" means strange, as Ken Lunde notes. I'm just pointing to his list, because it pulls together quite a few Han characters that *also* have dubious cases for encoding.

Or you could turn the argument around, I suppose, and note that just because the hieroglyph for "Egyptologist" is strange, that doesn't necessarily mean that the case for encoding it is dubious. ;-)

--Ken

On 2/13/2020 3:47 PM, j...@koremail.com wrote:
An interesting comparison, if strange means dubious, then the name kstrange should be changed or some of the content removed because many of the characters in the set are not dubious in the least.

Reply via email to