On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:18:40 +0100
Hans Åberg via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
> > On 13 Feb 2020, at 00:26, Shawn Steele <shawn.ste...@microsoft.com>
> > wrote:
> >> From the point of view of Unicode, it is simpler: If the character
> >> is in use or have had use, it should be included somehow.
> >
> > That bar, to me, seems too low. Many things are only used briefly
> > or in a private context that doesn't really require encoding.
>
> That is a private use area for more special use.
Writing the plural ('Egyptologists') by writing the plural strokes below
the glyph could be difficult if the renderer won't include them in the
same script run.
Richard.
